home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- X-Mailer: MicroDot 1.11beta12 [REGISTERED 00042d] via [DOS/NCBMail V2.21 REL.:160995]
- Message-ID: <xS1t3MD42Dacz9@point70.people-s.people.de>
- Organization: People-S Mailboxsystem
- References: <haraldk.64.31444B59@sofus.hiof.no>
- X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UU people-s.people.de [DUUCP vom 01.07.1994]
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- From: j_plewka@people-s.people.de (Joern Plewka)
- Subject: Re: Nemac IV on CV64
- Date: 16 Mar 1996 23:23:19 +0100
- Path: people-s.people.de!j_plewka
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Distribution: world
-
- haraldk@sofus.hiof.no (Harald Kuhr) -> "Re: Nemac IV on CV64"
- (11.03.1996)
- > In article <313B1229.155C@brunel.ac.uk> Philip Chung <ee95pyc@brunel.ac.uk> writes:
- >
- > >I've just tried the Nemac IV demo (from Amiga Computing) with my
- > >CyberVision card and it seems to run very very slowly, slower than
- > >native Amiga screenmodes. Could this be something to do with a memory
- > >shortage? I have an A4000/030 with 6Mb. RAM, a 2Mb. CV64 and 15" smile
- > >monitor.
- >
- > Maybe. But my friends 4000/040 25 with 16 MB ram was not really fast either.
- > My 40 mhz CyberStorm was much faster :)
- >
- > (Both with CV64)
- >
- > Could be the slow memory access of the stock 4000?
-
- Yep, for this style of games there is no difference if it`s a 030
- or A3640 A3000/A4000. One of my friends is doing DoomStyle programming
- too. We did some messures very different in special parts of the
- engine but nearly equal in summary;-((((
-
- A3640 is very lame for that...Cyberstorm and CyberGFX-Board very fast;-)
-
- / no / / AMIGA /
- / MS+ / J_Plewka@Amtrash.comlink.de / is /
- / gAIDS / Plewka_J@Informatik.FH-Hamburg.de / back /
- / / / /
-
-
-
-